Prompt Version Studio: Git for AI Instructions
AI teams lose thousands in API costs testing prompts manually, can't reproduce results across versions, and lack collaboration workflows for prompt engineering.
AI teams lose thousands in API costs testing prompts manually, can't reproduce results across versions, and lack collaboration workflows for prompt engineering.
RAG systems return redundant, similar documents that make LLM outputs repetitive and waste context window space. Developers need intelligent diversification without sacrificing relevance.
Creatives lose hours recreating "that version from two weeks ago" because traditional creative tools lack granular version control. Unlike code, design files are opaque binaries with no Git-like timeline, forcing designers to manually save duplicates or lose work forever.
Generic AI tools (Midjourney, DALL-E) produce derivative outputs that don't match a creator's signature style. Creatives spend hours manually editing AI generations to fit their brand, defeating the automation purpose. Inspired by HN's "The Case for the Return of Fine-Tuning", what if every creative could have a personal AI trained exclusively on their work?
Creatives optimize for portfolios and award juries, not end-users. Beautiful designs often fail accessibility standards, usability heuristics, and inclusive design principles—costing clients conversions and exposing them to legal risk. Inspired by HN's "Websites Are for Humans" article, what if AI could be a ruthless human-advocacy auditor?
Every creative has gigabytes of forgotten genius buried in old projects, external drives, and cloud archives. These "lost" works represent untapped portfolio material, stock asset potential, and emotional resonance—but manual excavation is overwhelming. Inspired by HN's story of Jack Kerouac's lost manuscript, what if AI could be your digital archaeologist?
Creatives waste 40% of billable time researching industries they're unfamiliar with—analyzing competitors, understanding client markets, gathering visual references. Each new project (fintech app, sustainable fashion brand, medical device) requires hours of Google/Pinterest rabbit holes before design begins. What if AI could deliver expert-level research in minutes?
Teams download pre-trained models from HuggingFace, datasets from Kaggle, and training scripts from GitHub without security vetting - one compromised checkpoint could exfiltrate your proprietary data or inject backdoors.
AI teams waste thousands monthly on unnecessary fine-tuning when prompt engineering or RAG would deliver better ROI, or vice versa - they over-rely on expensive API calls when a small fine-tuned model would pay for itself in weeks.
Data scientists prototype brilliant models in Jupyter notebooks, then their code sits unused for months because productionizing requires complete rewrites - the "notebook-to-production" gap kills 70% of ML projects.